What is lateral entry into bureaucracy

Lateral Entry Into bureaucracy in Tamil | அரசு உயர் பதவிகளுக்கு நேரடி  நியமனம்.. ஏன் சர்ச்சையானது? மத்திய அரசு ஏன் ரத்து செய்தது?

Context

A recent advertisement to recruit 45 members laterally to posts under the aegis of the Union Service Public Commission has sparked controversy.

About

  • It refers to the exercise of recruiting people from outside the conventional civil services (along with the Indian Administrative Service, Indian Police Service, and Indian Revenue Service) to fill senior and mid-level positions in government ministries and departments.
  • The appointments are especially to be made for the posts of the Director, Joint Secretary and also Deputy Secretary.
  • A Joint Secretary, appointed by the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC), has the third highest rank (after Secretary and Additional Secretary) in a Department, and features as administrative head of a wing within the Department.
    • Directors are a rank under that of Joint Secretary.
  • These recruits usually come from various backgrounds — private sector, academia, or different specialized fields — and are introduced to infuse fresh views, area information, and efficiency into the bureaucracy.

Historical Context

  • Congress-Led Rule: The idea of lateral entry isn’t totally new. During previous Congress-led governments, lateral appointments had been made.
    • For example, Dr. Manmohan Singh, who later became Prime Minister, was appointed as Financial Secretary through lateral entry.
    • Similarly, Montek Singh Ahluwalia served as Deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission via the equal course.
  • NDA’s Approach: Under Prime Minister’s leadership, the method of lateral entry was  organised and made more transparent. Experts from applicable fields are now recruited on a contractual foundation through the USA, which aims to decorate efficiency and convey specialized talents into the forms.

UPSC’s Role

  • The UPSC plays a critical position in lateral entry. Online packages are invited for ministries, departments, public sector undertakings, and autonomous bodies.
  • The contractual appointments are to start with for three years, extendable based on overall performance.

Arguments in Favour

  • Specialized Talent and Expertise: Proponents argue that lateral entry brings fresh perspectives and specialised skills.
    • By tapping into expertise from various fields—including technology, economics, or management—the authorities can decorate its decision-making approaches and service delivery.
  • Efficiency and Innovation: Lateral entrants can inject new thoughts, enhance performance, and force innovation.
    • Their experience in the private sector or academia can lead to more effective policy implementation and administrative reforms.
  • Transparency and Meritocracy: When done transparently, lateral entry guarantees that qualified people are decided on based on benefit as opposed to just examination ratings. This can support the meritocratic principles of the forms.
  • Shortfalls in quantity of Recruits: There is nearly 20% shortage of IAS officers in 24 state cadres in India. (Baswan Committee)

Arguments Against

  • Reservation Concerns: Critics fear that lateral entry bypasses reservation regulations for Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC).
    • They worry that it’d disproportionately affect illustration from marginalised groups.
  • Lack of Institutional Memory: Traditional civil servants have a deep information of bureaucratic processes and institutional memory.
    • Lateral entrants may also lack this context, leading to capability challenges in navigating complicated administrative systems.
  • Risk of Political Influence: There’s a hazard that lateral entrants could be politically inspired or used to similarly unique agendas.
    • Striking the right stability between knowledgw and neutrality is vital.

Why does lateral entry sidestep reservations?

  • Single-Post Classification: When a ministry advertises a function for lateral entry, it treats it as a single emptiness. As a result, the mandatory quotas for SC/ST/OBC applicants don’t apply.
  • Upside: Proponents argue that lateral entry brings fresh views, domain information, and efficiency. After all, occasionally you want a seasoned chef to spice up the bureaucratic curry.
  • Downside: Critics fear that this technique may sideline deserving candidates who’ve slogged by the UPSC checks.
    • They worry it can result in an expertise drain from the conventional civil services.

Conclusion and Way Forward

  • The government needs to first focus on the introduction of in residence specialisation and out of government paintings deputation.
  • For specialised technological improvements in which no Civil Servant is capable sufficient, a semi-everlasting team may be created by Lateral Entry.
  • The Limited Lateral Entry with attention on upskilling the in-house groups will assist create a balance among tons-wanted experience and technological enhancements along with clean functioning constitutional mechanisms.
  • Lateral entry remains a contentious but important reform. Striking the proper balance between subculture and innovation is critical for effective and responsive forms. As India maintains to conform, so should its administrative equipment.

Source: The Hindu

Share this with friends ->