INS Arighat Joins Indian Navy as Second Nuclear

INS Arighat Joins Indian Navy as Second Nuclear-Powered Submarine

Context

India’s second nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine, the INS Arighat, was commissioned into service at Visakhapatnam.

About

  • It features several technological improvements compared to its predecessor, INS Arihant.
  • Both submarines share the same reactor and dimensions but Arighat includes advanced layout and manufacturing technology.
  • Construction and Indigenization: The submarine concerned advanced technology, unique materials, and skilled workmanship.
    • It consists of indigenous structures and systems evolved by Indian scientists and industry.
  • Importance : INS Arighat enhances India’s nuclear triad, which incorporates land-based missiles, plane, and nuclear-powered submarines (SSBNs) with ballistic missiles.
    • It strengthens India’s nuclear deterrence and contributes to maintaining nearby strategic balance.

Nuclear Doctrine

  • Historical Context: In 1962 India’s nuclear guns development commenced after the 1962 war with China and China’s 1964 nuclear test.
  • In 1974 India carried out its first nuclear test, Pokhran-I, termed as a “non violent nuclear explosion.”
  • In 1998  India performed Pokhran-II assessments, which protected fission and thermonuclear systems, demonstrating functionality to integrate nuclear warheads with its missile program.

Features 

  • Credible Minimum Deterrence: India aims to preserve a reputable minimum deterrence.
  • No First Use (NFU) Policy: Nuclear weapons will most effectively be used in retaliation towards a nuclear attack on Indian territory or forces.
  • Massive Retaliation: Nuclear retaliation to a primary strike can be big and designed to inflict unacceptable damage.
  • Authorization: Nuclear retaliatory assaults can only be authorized by the civilian political management through the Nuclear Command Authority (NCA).
  • Non-Use Against Non-Nuclear States: India will now not use nuclear guns against non-nuclear weapon states.
  • Response to Biological/Chemical Attacks: India retains the option of nuclear retaliation inside the event of a main biological or chemical assault.
  • Export Controls and Treaties: Continued strict controls on nuclear and missile-associated cloth exports, participation in the Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty negotiations, and adherence to the moratorium on nuclear tests.
  • Commitment to Disarmament: Ongoing commitment to international, verifiable, and non-discriminatory nuclear disarmament.

Challenges and Issues

  • India still lags at the back of larger nuclear powers, with the United States, Russia, and China owning more advanced nuclear subs. 
  • China’s increasing fleet of nuclear-powered submarines and Pakistan’s capability development of sea-based nuclear deterrence pose demanding situations to India.
  • Some argue India’s “No First Use” (NFU) coverage and emphasis on a small arsenal may also undermine credible deterrence.
  • Critics consider the doctrine’s recognition of “minimal deterrence” and “massive retaliation” may not be enough against evolving threats.

Suggestion and Way Forward 

  • China’s advanced Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) capabilities and multiplied submarine deployments within the Indian Ocean highlight the need for India’s robust deterrence.
  • India’s nuclear capabilities have to be assessed relative to China and Pakistan, each of which have superior arsenals.
  • The commissioning of INS Arighat is critical for keeping a reputable second-strike functionality amid growing nuclear threats from China and Pakistan.
  • To make certain non-stop at-sea deterrence, India ought to aim to amplify its SSBN fleet, with a suggested goal of at least six SSBNs.

Source: The Hindu

Share this with friends ->