Context
India’s second nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine, the INS Arighat, was commissioned into service at Visakhapatnam.
About
- It features several technological improvements compared to its predecessor, INS Arihant.
- Both submarines share the same reactor and dimensions but Arighat includes advanced layout and manufacturing technology.
- Construction and Indigenization: The submarine concerned advanced technology, unique materials, and skilled workmanship.
- It consists of indigenous structures and systems evolved by Indian scientists and industry.
- Importance : INS Arighat enhances India’s nuclear triad, which incorporates land-based missiles, plane, and nuclear-powered submarines (SSBNs) with ballistic missiles.
- It strengthens India’s nuclear deterrence and contributes to maintaining nearby strategic balance.
Nuclear Doctrine
- Historical Context: In 1962 India’s nuclear guns development commenced after the 1962 war with China and China’s 1964 nuclear test.
- In 1974 India carried out its first nuclear test, Pokhran-I, termed as a “non violent nuclear explosion.”
- In 1998 India performed Pokhran-II assessments, which protected fission and thermonuclear systems, demonstrating functionality to integrate nuclear warheads with its missile program.
Features
- Credible Minimum Deterrence: India aims to preserve a reputable minimum deterrence.
- No First Use (NFU) Policy: Nuclear weapons will most effectively be used in retaliation towards a nuclear attack on Indian territory or forces.
- Massive Retaliation: Nuclear retaliation to a primary strike can be big and designed to inflict unacceptable damage.
- Authorization: Nuclear retaliatory assaults can only be authorized by the civilian political management through the Nuclear Command Authority (NCA).
- Non-Use Against Non-Nuclear States: India will now not use nuclear guns against non-nuclear weapon states.
- Response to Biological/Chemical Attacks: India retains the option of nuclear retaliation inside the event of a main biological or chemical assault.
- Export Controls and Treaties: Continued strict controls on nuclear and missile-associated cloth exports, participation in the Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty negotiations, and adherence to the moratorium on nuclear tests.
- Commitment to Disarmament: Ongoing commitment to international, verifiable, and non-discriminatory nuclear disarmament.
Challenges and Issues
- India still lags at the back of larger nuclear powers, with the United States, Russia, and China owning more advanced nuclear subs.
- China’s increasing fleet of nuclear-powered submarines and Pakistan’s capability development of sea-based nuclear deterrence pose demanding situations to India.
- Some argue India’s “No First Use” (NFU) coverage and emphasis on a small arsenal may also undermine credible deterrence.
- Critics consider the doctrine’s recognition of “minimal deterrence” and “massive retaliation” may not be enough against evolving threats.
Suggestion and Way Forward
- China’s advanced Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) capabilities and multiplied submarine deployments within the Indian Ocean highlight the need for India’s robust deterrence.
- India’s nuclear capabilities have to be assessed relative to China and Pakistan, each of which have superior arsenals.
- The commissioning of INS Arighat is critical for keeping a reputable second-strike functionality amid growing nuclear threats from China and Pakistan.
- To make certain non-stop at-sea deterrence, India ought to aim to amplify its SSBN fleet, with a suggested goal of at least six SSBNs.
Source: The Hindu
Post Views: 881